Tag Archive for Iran

Afghan President Karzai admits receiving “bags of cash” from Iran

Afghan President Hamid Karzai is flat out corrupt. It astounds me how some of my friends and colleagues on the right continue to defend this weasel.

(NY Times) His government will continue to receive the payments, which amount to no more than about a million dollars twice a year, he said at a news conference with the President Emomali Rahmonov of Tajikistan, adding that the money is part of a relationship between neighbors.

“They have asked for good relations in return, and for lots of other things in return,” said President Karzai.

“And we have also asked for lots of things in return in this relationship. This is a relationship between neighbors and it will go on and we will continue to ask for cash help from Iran.”

Iran goes nuclear, US says Israel is perfectly “safe”

I knew neither Israel nor the United States would have the prescience and intestinal fortitude to take out Iran’s nuclear facility.

The Hitler of our time, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad–a Holocaust denier and a man who has repeatedly stated he wants to wipe Israel off of the map (tyrants are to be taken at their word)–now possesses nuclear energy. And what is the Obama administration’s message to Israel?

You are perfectly “safe”. You have absolutely nothing to worry about.

And the United Kingdom says that they have “always respected” Iran’s nuclear “right”.

Let there be no doubt: The rest of the World, and now the United States government, under the imam-in-chief Barack Hussein Obama, hates Israel.

Dems strategy for selling Obamacare: Paint opposition as racist, violent extremists

The Democrats know that a significant majority of Americans loathe Obamacare. They also know that they are losing the debate on the merits of Obamacare because there aren’t any merits. As a result, the Democrats are attempting to divert attention away from the actual debate by branding Obamacare’s opposition as violent extremists who are threatening the lives of congressional Democrats.

But there is good news for President Obama: not everyone hates Obamacare. In fact, Obamacare received Cuban dictator Fidel Castro’s seal of approval earlier today. Apparently it’s just us non-socialists who oppose Obamacare.

While Obama dictates and bullies domestically, he’s getting bullied on the international front. He is softening the new proposed sanctions against Iran in order to win the support of Russia and China at the U.N.

Play

Iran is officially a nuclear state; Number of illegals decreases in U.S.; Niall Ferguson rebuffs Tim Geithner

From today’s podcast:

And the award for least shocking story of this early year goes to? Iran is a nuclear state! How about some more sanctions, because they’re working marvelously.

The number of illegal aliens in the U.S. has decreased from 11.6 to 10.8 million in 2009. See? I told you there was a bright side to this economic downturn.

Harvard economist Niall Ferguson rebuffs Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner’s claim that the U.S. debt is a “safe haven” for the rest of the world’s economies.

Play
Play

Moody’s hints at lowering U.S. credit rating; Egyptian sources: Israel planning to attack Iran

Links for today’s podcast:

Play

Iranian threat ratchets up

Here are the links to the news stories for today’s podcast:

Play

Is Israel about to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities, or is this a response to an increased Iranian threat?

Play

Iranian protestors: Inexorable courage

Liberty, when it begins to take root, is a plant of rapid growth.

–George Washington

A valiant event occurred in Iran on Monday. The New York Times reported that 88 Iranian professors from Tehran University signed a letter asking the Iranian supreme religious leader, Ali Khamenei, to cease the use of violence against protestors. The letter harshly condemns the government’s oppression:

Nighttime attacks on defenseless student dormitories and daytime assaults on students at university campuses, venues of education and learning, is not a sign of strength,” the letter read in part. “Nor is beating up students and their mass imprisonment.

These professors deserve tremendous respect for their courageous opposition against the Iranian regime. According to the article, although the letters “did nothing to deter authorities” who are continuing their arrests and violence towards protestors, these letters “did challenge the authority of Ayatollah Khamenei, something that was unthinkable and punishable before the protests that broke out in June after what the opposition calls a fraudulent presidential election.”

It is inspiring to read about the protestors’ relentless fight for political freedom and basic human rights in the face of repeated violence and adversity; meanwhile, much of the western world remains silent or blissfully ignorant. The Iranian government is feeling the heat. The enraged populace is sending them a stark message. Successful revolutions always require a citizenry dedicated to overthrowing their oppressors; foreigners cannot attempt to democratize a government for a population that has no desire for democratic rule. It doesn’t work. That’s why it is imperative to support this revolution.

An overthrow of the Iranian regime would raise eyebrows across the Middle East. Is an overthrow likely? I remain skeptical. But that doesn’t mean the demonstrators don’t have my full support. They should have full support from every American; why shouldn’t we support the Iranians who desire legitimate political elections and the right to peacefully protest? Why shouldn’t we support their relentless push towards greater democratic ideals?

Our government has been tight-lipped over the past months. Charles Krauthammer notes as much:

Obama responded by distancing himself from this new birth of freedom. First, scandalous silence. Then, a few grudging words. Then relentless engagement with the murderous regime. With offer after offer, gesture after gesture — to not Iran, but the “Islamic Republic of Iran,” as Obama ever so respectfully called these clerical fascists — the United States conferred legitimacy on a regime desperate to regain it.

Why is this so important? Because revolutions succeed at that singular moment, that imperceptible historical inflection, when the people, and particularly those in power, realize that the regime has lost the mandate of heaven. With this weakening dictatorship desperate for affirmation, why is the United States repeatedly offering just such affirmation?

The protestors should be encouraged for our own national interests as well: what if they successfully overthrow the Iranian regime before they have a chance to complete their nuclear interests? Could this prevent future cataclysmic events? Benjamin Netanyahu has made bold, scolding remarks connoting a future Israeli war with Iran; he has yet to act upon them. I believe he eventually will. But, if the demonstrators have any successes, perhaps such a war can be avoided or dramatically limited.

Rick Moran at American Thinker echoes my views regarding the continuing oppression:

Such actions are not tamping down the protests but rather igniting them. My guess is the next big catalyst for demonstrations may very well topple Khamenei and his crew.

Some might consider my optimism to be purely that: over-speculative, wishful optimism. However, there is nothing to lose by encouraging the protestors. Every shred of resistance towards the Iranian oppressors is positive. The protestors once chanted: “Obama, Obama, you are either with us or with them.” There is nothing ambiguous about that. They deserve their shot at self-governance and freedom from oppression; such ideals should be championed by everyone—especially Americans.

Ahmadinejad says U.S., Israel lack “courage” to attack Iran

Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is actually telling the truth for a change.

He is calling ours and Israel’s bluff. He’s calling out the cowardice of our two countries.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Monday that the threat of a U.S. or Israeli military strike against Iran was no longer an issue because “they don’t have the courage” to attack Iran.

“The age of military attacks is over, now we’ve reached the time for dialogue and understanding. Weapons and threats are a thing of the past,” the Iranian president said at a joint press conference with Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, closing his one-day visit.

He’s right. Folks, we don’t have the courage to even offend our enemies much less attack them with the full might of our military. And hell, according to our military leaders our “diversity” is our greatest military asset.  What are we going to do, attack Iran with our diversity?

We heard nothing but threat after threat from President Bush, now we’re hearing the same of Benjamin Netanyahu. Netanyahu’s talk is getting very cheap. We know where Chairman Obama stands; he’s not going to do anything for Israel. He will look out for his Palestinian brethren though.

America and Israel are cowards when it comes to taking military action against Iran.

Benjamin Netanyahu: Clarity Unmatched

“Yesterday, the man who calls the Holocaust a lie spoke from this podium. To those who refused to come here and to those who left this room in protest, I commend you. You stood up for moral clarity and you brought honor to your countries.

But to those who gave this Holocaust-denier a hearing, I say on behalf of my people, the Jewish people, and decent people everywhere: Have you no shame?  Have you no decency?

A mere six decades after the Holocaust, you give legitimacy to a man who denies that the murder of six million Jews took place and pledges to wipe out the Jewish state.

What a disgrace!  What a mockery of the charter of the United Nations!  Perhaps some of you think that this man and his odious regime threaten only the Jews. You’re wrong.

History has shown us time and again that what starts with attacks on the Jews eventually ends up engulfing many others.”

–Benjamin Netanyahu

This above quote is an excerpt from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech before the United Nations on September 24, 2009. The first of four video clips of his speech can be watched here.

Mr. Netanyahu, I applaud your adamant condemnation of the Iranian dictator, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and your harsh words against those who refuse to denounce him. While our domestic leaders have halfheartedly spoken out against this disgusting man for the atrocities and oppression his government is guilty of, you took an aggressive stance to try and curb his power.

This disgusting man, a fervent Holocaust denier, continuously spews his anti-semetic rhetoric for the world to hear. It seems that most of us have heard it; therefore, what will our leaders do about it? Will they denounce this man who continues to pursue a nuclear program while simutaneously blustering that the state of Israel should be “wiped off the map?”

The Obama Administration, including Robert Gates, doesn’t believe that we should take out Iran’s nuclear facilites ourselves. Due to their cowardice, we are not left with many options. The United States would be able to take care of this problem with minimal time and bloodshed, but somehow our government feels the need to act diplomatically with terrorists. Isn’t that sweet of them?

There have been discussions regarding the likely possibility of an Israeli attack on Iran, which is bound to cause mass chaos. An oil embargo against Iran, designed to economically force the country to comply with sanctions, is also a possibility. The latter should be tried first, but as soon as possible, in order to try avoiding a larger war outside the realm of those two nations (specifically one targeted against Israel by nations other than Iran). This means that the international community must unite together against Iran, otherwise an embargo will be a completely useless and pacifist choice.
Read more

SecDef Gates: Diplomacy Best Option for Iran, No Military Option

That stooge known as our Secretary of Defense, Robert Gates (aka the new John McCain), is out there spewing liberal filth and policy again. This time it’s on Iran:

Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates says that economic sanctions and diplomacy — not military action — for now appears the best way to force Iran to halt its nuclear program.

“The reality is, there is no military option that does anything more than buy time,” Mr. Gates said on CNN’s “State of the Union.” “The only way you end up not having a nuclear-capable Iran is for the Iranian government to decide that their security is diminished by having those weapons, as opposed to strengthened.

“While you don’t take options off the table, I think there’s still room left for diplomacy. ”

Mr. Gates said estimates show that Iran, if left unchecked, could produce nuclear weapons in one to three years.

He says that we don’t want to take any options “off the table,” yet he did just that by openly stating that, in his and Chairman Obama’s opinion, there are no military options. This guy is really something. He’s the definition of a politically expedient, spineless coward.

Really? There are no military targets in Iran? Um, what about the nuclear sites themselves, genius!? Destroying those would do more than simply “buy time.” Oh, and what about the Revolutionary Guard, which just so happens to be conducting war games right now. That’s not a target?

Come on. It’s time for Israel to stop talking about ending the Iranian nuclear threat. Do it already! We here in America obviously aren’t going to do anything about it. Netanyahu clearly and articulately laid out the case against Iran in a speech to the U.N. last week. He needs to start acting like the hawk he ran as.

Either do something, or shut-up about it!