Tag Archive for Islamofascism

The mission in the war on terror should to be to eliminate Islamofascism (sorry Eric Holder)

On today’s edition of The Conservative Beacon Podcast with Josh Price:

  1. The war in Afghanistan is now the longest in U.S. history and it’s because we have tried to fight in a politically correct, sensitized way. The mission for the War on Terror should be to destroy Islamofascism which is, sorry Eric Holder, the enemy.
  2. Obama administration denies any impropriety in Sestak job offers.
  3. Author Warren Kozak gives a detailed biography of the great American patriot and General Curtis LeMay

Have a safe and wonderful Memorial Day weekend everybody! Thank you to all of the servicemen and women who have paid the ultimate price to this country. God bless you. God bless our living veterans and those currently serving.

God bless America!

Play

Race-baiter Tavis Smiley’s new gig: Public relations for Islamofascism

I’ve been on the record stating that neither Michael Steele or any other so-called Republican or conservative should ever be a part of any event in which Tavis Smiley is associated (this includes Smiley’s annual State of Black America, which Steele has attended in the past).

We have known for a while that Tavis Smiley is nothing but an ignorant race-baiter (Cornel West is one of his buddies) masquerading as a pseudo-intellectual claiming to be the leader of the black community. Now he shows us just how ignorant he is while performing his apparent new job: public relations spokesman for Islam:

And guess what? Because Smiley’s show airs on PBS, we’re paying for it.

So-called counterterrorism czar John Brennan is an example of the ‘enemy within’

On today’s edition of The Conservative Beacon Podcast with Josh Price:

  1. Helen Thomas is a disgusting, despicable, liberal hag who doesn’t understand why we’re fighting in Afghanistan.
  2. John Brennan is a prime example of what conservative intellectual Michael Savage calls the “enemy within.” Brennan says that jihad is a “legitimate tenet of Islam.” I don’t know how else to take that statement other than Brennan is justifying “holy war” against the infidel.
  3. He is obviously an apologist for Islamofascism. He must go!

Play

AG Eric Holder refuses to acknowledge radical Islam’s role in terrorism

Attorney General Eric Holder refuses to acknowledge our enemy:

Cowardice. Disgusting. Politically correct. Unsurprising.

Political correctness is enabling terrorism and it’s destroying America.

Comedy Central censors South Park, acquiescing to Islamofascist intimidation

As I posted on Tuesday, an Islamofascist website threatened “warned” of “retribution” against the creators of South Park, Matt Stone and Trey Parker, for depicting Islam’s Muhammad as bear. The site insinuated that Parker and Stone might receive the same fate of murdered Dutch filmmaker Theo Van Gogh (because that’s not a gross overreaction at all).

Well guess what? Comedy Central has relented to the Islamofascists’ intimidation, censoring last night’s episode of South Park.

Last night, “South Park” continued the controversial Muhammad storyline, but with a key difference: every instance of the words “Prophet Muhammad” was bleeped out, making the episode practically incomprehensible, especially to anybody who missed the previous week.

The character of Muhammad was once again also hidden from view, covered by a large block labeled “censored.”

A Comedy Central spokesperson confirmed it was the network’s decision to bleep the words.

The Muhammad content is also not available on the South Park Studios website.

Comedy Central is obviously run by a bunch of politically correct cowards. This makes me sick. The intimidation will continue for as long as the cowards in Hollywood and the media continue to placate the Islamofascists.

Question: Why is it OK to mock every religion except Islam on television? Answer: Because Christians, Hindus, Jews, and the followers of every other religion not named Islam don’t kill or threaten to kill people who offend them.

Islamofascist website warns ‘South Park’ creators they might die for depicting Muhammad as a bear

Memo to all non-Muslims: Offend an Islamofascist and you might be killed:

A radical Islamic website is warning the creators of “South Park” that they could face violent retribution for depicting the Prophet Muhammad in a bear suit during an episode broadcast on Comedy Central last week.

RevolutionMuslim.com posted the warning following the 200th episode of Trey Parker and Matt Stone’s “South Park,” which included a caricature of the Prophet Muhammad disguised in a bear suit. The Web posting also included a graphic photo of Theo van Gogh, a Dutch filmmaker who was murdered in 2004 after making a documentary on violence against Muslim women.

“We have to warn Matt and Trey that what they are doing is stupid and they will probably wind up like Theo Van Gogh for airing this show,” the posting reads. “This is not a threat, but a warning of the reality of what will likely happen to them.”

And yet it’s Christians and Jews who are portrayed on television as religious zealots and nutjobs.

Joe Lieberman: Dropping ‘Islamic extremism’ term is “Orewellian and counterproductive”

Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.), contrary to what some on the right would have us believe, isn’t a conservative; he’s even too liberal to be considered a would-be RINO if he were a Republican–he’s quintessentially liberal on most social issues. However, he is a liberal with whom we can work in some areas, including many defense and national security issues, because he, unlike most contemporary liberals, doesn’t want America to be degraded to the point of subservience to the rest of the world.

Instead of ridiculing and working to weaken America like most modern liberals, Sen. Lieberman is fighting to defend and secure this great country from Islamofascism.

Case in point: He has written a letter to President Obama’s incompetent, hyper-sensitive-to-criticism counterterrorism czar John Brennan making the same argument I have been making: we will not win the War on Terror as long as we refuse to accurately identify our enemy–Islamic extremists.

The failure to identify our enemy for what it is, violent Islamist extremism, is offensive and contradicts thousands of years of accepted military and intelligence doctrine to know your enemy.

I have my issues with Sen. Lieberman: He is socially liberal; he supports amnesty for illegals; and he was Al Gore’s VP candidate just name a few. But he is 100% correct in fighting the imposition of political correctness in the War on Terror.

Remember what I have been saying: political correctness is enabling terrorism.

Obama should just surrender

We are not going to win the War on Terror so long as the Obama administration continues to weaken our deterrent and defense capabilities and substituting political correctness for logic and reality.

President Obama has committed to reducing America’s nuclear arsenal by one-third and to halt the development and production of new generations of nuclear weapons. He informed our adversaries and outright enemies that America, as long as he is president, will not use nuclear weapons even if attacked with a chemical or biological weapon.

Now the Obama administration is again attempting to infuse more political correctness into the vocabulary used to describe the War on Terror and our enemy. Remember early last year when we were told that it was a no longer a war on terror but rather an “overseas contingency operation?” Well the administration is taking it a step farther. President Obama has decided to remove “Islamic radicalism” from a forthcoming national security document.

This administration may as well send up the white flag. If we’re unwilling to both properly characterize the enemy and state the mission of the War on Terror in as unambiguous and politically incorrect terms as possible we’re going to lose.

Pakistan refusing to fight terrorism

The Pakistani army has announced that it will not be carrying out any new offensives against Taliban and al-Qaeda (AQ) fighters along the Pakistan-Afghan border.

They’re using the excuse of needing time to stabilize the gains they made on their recent offensive in the region.

This decision is par for the course for Pakistan with respect to “fighting” terrorism. The Pakistanis aren’t serious about fighting terrorism. Why not? I’ll give you two reasons:

  1. Fighting Islamo-fascism isn’t at the top of their priority list, India is. They view both the Pakistani and Afghan Taliban as potential proxies against Indian interests inside Afghanistan.
  2. They tacitly approve and, in my opinion, support terrorism against America and our interests.

On the first point, some American officials agree with me:

American officials privately say that the Pakistanis are reluctant to go after the Afghan Taliban and the Haqqani network because they see them as a future proxy against Indian interests in Afghanistan when the Americans leave. India is Pakistan’s archrival in the region.

Believe it or not, I understand why Pakistan feels this way. I don’t agree with it, but I understand it. They are simply acting in their self-interest. And that’s fine, but if they don’t want to take care of the terrorism problem inside their country, we should. fighting terrorism is in our self-interest.

As to my second point, I truly believe that, at a minimum, most Pakistanis tacitly approve of terrorism against the West. We know for a fact that the Pakistani intelligence service has repeatedly aided Taliban and AQ members. There are two reasons that the Pakistani government and army aren’t more vocal in their support for terrorism against us:

  1. They don’t want to lose the millions in aid and equipment we give them (which, by the way, they’re aren’t using to fight terrorism; they’re saving it for war with India); and
  2. They don’t want a war with the United States.

This is why the Pakistanis will never solve their terrorism problem: They don’t view it as a problem. They will simply continue to do what they’ve been doing for years now: attempt to take just enough action to appease our government leaders.

We need to demand more from the Pakistanis, or we need to go root out the terrorists ourselves. And I don’t care if the Pakistanis cry that we’re infringing on their sovereignty; they should have taken care of the problem themselves.

Pentagon refuses to acknowledge the involvement of political correctness in Ft. Hood terrorist attack

Civilian and military brass at the Pentagon want you to believe that the terrorist attack (oh wait, they won’t even call it a terrorist attack) was the result of negligence by Maj. Nidal Hasan’s superiors in the Army. As I’ve written about before, the attack wasn’t the result of negligence, it’s the result of radical Islam (Islamo-fascism) and political correctness.

A couple of terrorism experts are echoing my take on this:

Patrick S. Poole, a counterterrorism consultant to government and law enforcement, said the Pentagon report did not address the problem of political correctness in the military “that allowed for Maj. Hasan’s continued rise despite his poor performance.” Mr. Poole said an “atmosphere of intimidation” exists in the military regarding Islamist threats that “prevented any substantive complaints to [Maj. Hasan's] increasingly extremist statements.”

“Everyone along the way was content to give him a pass,” Mr. Poole said.

Terrorism expert Steve Emerson, a frequent guest on The Conservative Beacon, agrees:

“The military is still mired in this murderous political correctness,” Mr. Emerson said, adding that religion, contrary to what Mr. West said, is “every part of the problem” in the shootings.

“Hassan’s jihadist beliefs were that infidels should be killed in the military,” Mr. Emerson said.

But Robert Gates, Mike Mullen, Janet Napolitano and Chairman Obama himself will not acknowledge this fact. And actually, Gen. George Casey essentially defended political correctness and the mentality in the military that allowed the attack to take place when he said the following late last year:

I’m concerned that this increased speculation could cause a backlash against some of our Muslim soldiers. And I’ve asked our Army leaders to be on the lookout for that,” Casey told CNN’s “State of the Union.”

“Our diversity, not only in our Army, but in our country, is a strength. And as horrific as this tragedy was, if our diversity becomes a casualty, I think that’s worse,” Casey said. (My emphasis)

The fear of offending Muslim soldiers and Muslims as a whole allowed the attack on Ft. Hood to take place, Gen. Casey! It was this fear that prevented Hasan’s superiors from doing their jobs.

This is the environment that political correctness has created. I’m going to restate the phrase I coined last week: Political correctness is enabling terrorism. It’s not causing terrorism, but it’s allowing it at best and encouraging it at worst.

Political correctness is enabling terrorism.