Tag Archive for Liberalism

Barack Obama: Today’s chief Gnostic

July 31, 2010 Culture, Government One comment

Ellis Washington


Gnostic [liberal] politics is self-defeating in so far as its disregard for the structure of reality leads to continuous warfare.

–Eric Voegelin

I am astounded by the connections of modern liberalism and first-century Gnosticism – arguably the most subtle, diabolical and enduring heresy of the New Testament church. Dr. Benjamin Wiker, in his latest opus, “10 Books Every Conservative Must Read,” writing on Eric Voegelin’s great work, “The New Science of Politics” (1952), stated:

Voegelin argues that we cannot properly understand the epically destructive character of 20th-century utopianism unless we understand the nature of a particular, ancient Christian heresy, Gnosticism. For Voegelin, Gnosticism defines the nature of modernity, or more exactly, of a particular virulent and destructive strain of modern thought, a strain that includes liberalism, Marxism and National Socialism.

In his “Ryrie Study Bible” (1978), the great theologian Dr. Charles Ryrie had this important note on Gnosticism and its place in biblical history:

The heresy of Gnosticism had begun to make inroads among churches in John’s day. Among its teachings were: 1) knowledge is superior to virtue; 2) the nonliteral sense of Scripture is correct and can be understood only by a select few; 3) evil in the world precludes God’s being the only Creator; 4) the incarnation is incredible because deity cannot unite itself with anything material such as a body (Docetism); and 5) there is no resurrection of the flesh. The ethical standards of many Gnostics were low, so John emphasized the reality of the incarnation and the high ethical standard of the earthly life of Christ.

Doesn’t the ancient cult of Gnosticism, which systematically sought to pervert and denigrate Christianity, sound strangely similar to modern political liberalism, which, since the Enlightenment Age, systematically sought to pervert and eliminate Christianity from the marketplace of ideas?

Regarding American liberalism, pick any utopian socialist – from Woodrow Wilson, FDR, LBJ, Clinton, Carter, Obama, to the useful idiots of atheism, feminism, gay rights, civil-rights activists, the labor and teachers’ unions – and you will find a person who thinks his knowledge base (politics) is superior to virtue; that the Bible is a collection of myths that isn’t to be taken literally; that moral relativism holds that all religions lead to “god” and that no religion is better (or worse) than any other; that separation of church and state is the singular dogma of liberalism; that there are no miracles, God or need for a savior. The State is god, and god is the State. The state under socialism will give everyone heaven (utopia) on earth through cradle-to-grave care. Private property, liberty and independent man are all relics of a bygone era.

Jeffrey Nelson, a student of Russell Kirk (author of “The Conservative Mind”), writing on Voegelin’s profound contributions to political philosophy, remarked that Voegelin saw communism and its related political philosophies – liberalism, progressivism, fascism and socialism – as only the latest of man’s efforts to “shortcut” heaven and have it on earth. “Voegelin argued that one of the defining marks of modernity was the increasingly popular view that politics was essentially about the pursuit of secular salvation.”

This connects to the modern Gnostic idea to empower this world with all the essentials that orthodox Christianity held to be possible only in the next world, or what Voegelin refers to as the “re-divinization” of the political area, which suggests characterizing the state as a substitute divinity.

During the Age of Enlightenment, it was Descartes, Hobbes, Spinoza and Rousseau who advocated the subordination of religion to the aims of the secular state, while later philosophers like Comte, Marx and Nietzsche willfully called for the elimination of religion and the divinization of man.

Since nature abhors a vacuum, what would replace Western Civilization’s Judeo-Christian worldview? The philosophers, humanists and atheists of the Enlightenment Age presented a new science – secular science – that would bring now what Christianity could only promise in the afterlife. Voegelin believed that the secularists rejected religion but redivinized politics, which justified the creation of a totalizing, omnipotent, secular state, or what Hobbes called Leviathan – the supposed provider of all good things and the professed destroyer of every evil vestige of antiquity, especially organized religion. Such is the terrible monster of the modern dictatorship and why liberalism leads naturally to tyranny.

Wiker said, “For Voegelin, then, liberalism is part of this Gnostic rebellion against Christianity, or more accurately, an heretical simplification of it. It offers a fundamentally materialistic view of humanity, where man can be led to a technological utopia administered by an ever more powerful and centralized government.”

From antiquity, the cult of Gnosticism, like Marxism, liberalism and progressivism in modern times, is a form of thinking that claims complete cognitive control of reality. Relying as it does on claims to gnosis – the idea that disorder in the world can be transcended by progressive insight, education, or understanding, Gnosticism therefore believes its knowledge to be beyond any criticism.

Following the continuum from the ancient cult of Gnosticism, to humanism and secular liberalism formed during the Enlightenment, to the 20th-century Progressive Movement, to post-modern times under President Barack Obama, we are faced with the fact that Obama is the embodiment of the Gnostic heresy.

Yes, Obama sat in the Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s church for 20 years soaking up racist Black Liberation Theology. Yes, Obama claims to be a Christian, yet his socialist policies over the past 18 months have done more to undermine Christianity and every aspect of American exceptionalism than did the three former fascist presidencies of Woodrow Wilson, FDR and LBJ. Yes, Obama arrogantly intoned: “We are the ones we’ve been waiting for” and “I want to fundamentally transform America.”

All Americans of goodwill should join Voegelin’s fight against political tyranny, for it was he who 80 years ago exposed communism as the new “secular salvation; the latest of man’s attempt to shortcut heaven and have it on earth.” Let us today apply Voegelin’s brilliant intellect and strategies to defeat Obama’s progressivism, whose dystopia, alienation, anti-constitutionalism and legalized thievery has already brought a measure of heaven to hell in America.

Report from Washington with Ellis Washington for June 16, 2010

June 16, 2010 Culture, Government, Podcast No comments

On this week’s edition of the Report from Washington with Ellis Washington, Ellis and Conservative Beacon’s Josh Price discuss:

  1. The Liberal-Fascist Axis, Part 2;
  2. The connection between abortion and slavery; and
  3. President Obama tries to force BP to create an escrow to pay claims of oil spill victims.

Tune in every Monday to Conservative Beacon for the Report from Washington with WorldNetDaily columnist, author, and radio talk-show host Ellis Washington.

Play

Podcast: Download

The Liberal-Fascist Axis, Part 2

June 14, 2010 Culture, Government 2 comments

Ellis Washington


The left supported Hitler not because he deceived them. They knew Hitler would kill. He said he would. In fact, it was why they supported him.

–Latvian documentary “The Soviet Story” (2008)

I am more than willing to drop the radical pose for the radical ends.

–Van Jones (Communist, Obama’s former green czar)

Prologue

Slavery, abortion, social Darwinism (evolution), eugenics, fascism (i.e., Nazism, communism, liberalism), are perhaps the five most diabolical and irredeemable ideas of the past 160 years; yet despite civil wars, world wars, social revolutions, civil-rights acts, Christian revivals and political reforms, this five-headed monster is still alive and thrives under the totalitarian cult of liberalism, now called “progressivism.”

  1. Slavery. Slavery has existed since the earliest annals of human history and has been practiced at some period by virtually every nation and tribe on earth. In America, it took a bloody Civil War to bring an end to this “peculiar institution” in 1865 and later by law via the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments.

    The Democratic Party proliferated and profited most from slavery, and yet because of liberal hegemony in the academy, courts, Congress, media and Hollywood, the virulently racist background and political madness of liberalism has been largely erased from the history books, and all sins forgiven. Why? Because the Democrats co-opted the black vote in the early 1930s, and LBJ got all the credit for passing the Civil Rights Act (1964, 1968) and the Voting Rights Act (1965).

  2. Abortion. Abortion is the act of a woman causing the premature termination of her baby and pregnancy. Despite volumes written on abortion, few writers have made the unmistakable connection between the twin evils of abortion and slavery – such as, for every 1,000 black babies born in America, there are 472 unborn black babies aborted, or for every two black babies born, one black baby is aborted.

    The NAACP and the civil-rights movement essentially support the genocide of their own race.

    I made the existential connection between slavery and abortion in a Socratic dialogue:

    Socrates: Indeed. You must first tell us why this day does America allow an average of 1.5 million abortions annually and 40 million to 53 million abortions worldwide? Why have between 40 million and 50 million abortions occurred in America alone since Roe v. Wade (1973)? This, in a country that in your own Declaration promised each of her citizens “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness”? Why, Mr. ACLU?

    Attorney ACLU: {indignant} B-B-B-But, but, but, but abortions are an entirely different issue than slavery.

    Socrates: I agree if by “different” you mean in the manner of execution. However, the public policy is the same: One person, the slave master with slavery and one woman or Supreme Court justice with abortion, has the legal authority to kill another human being, correct, Attorney ACLU?

  3. Social Darwinism (evolution). Social Darwinism understands that the laws of Darwinian evolution by natural selection are applicable to social structures and public policy. Despite the instant and worldwide cult following of evolution since the 1860s, Darwin was rightly skeptical and in a famous letter to Asa Gray Darwin shared his doubts about evolution, writing: “… I am quite conscious that my speculations run beyond the bounds of true science. … It is a mere rag of an hypothesis with as many flaw[s] and holes as sound parts.”

    In his 1882 book, “Selection in Relation to Sex,” social Darwinism was his major thesis:

    Thus the weak members of civilized societies propagate their kind. No one who has attended to the breeding of domestic animals will doubt that this must be highly injurious to the race of man … hardly any one is so ignorant as to allow his worst animals to breed.

    Who determines who lives and who dies? Progressives, of course.

  4. Eugenics. “Eugenics is the study and practice of selective breeding applied to humans, with the aim of improving the species.” Eugenics was founded by Darwin’s cousin, Francis Galton. Margaret Sanger zealously propagated eugenics before becoming the founder of Planned Parenthood, one of the largest abortion providers in the world. Sanger’s entire idea for eugenics (of which abortion is its logical consequence) was to bring genocide to the black race, which Sanger and many progressive intellectuals believed was by nature unworthy of full participation in civilization.
  5. Fascism. Throughout history, liberalism, totalitarianism, terrorism, anarchy and fascism have been bedfellows – during the Age of Enlightenment (Voltaire, Rousseau, Diderot, Jefferson), through its systemic corruption during the French Revolution (the Jacobins, Robespierre) and later during 19th-century German Romanticism (Schopenhauer, Wagner, Kaiser Wilhelm, Darwin, Nietzsche). The 20th century saw liberalism morph into theprogressive movement and the modern welfare state (Lippmann, Croly, John Dewey, Woodrow Wilson, FDR, LBJ, Obama) where the apotheosis of the State has essentially replaced God, reason, constitutionalism and Natural Law.

    Dr. Benjamin Wiker’s “10 Books That Screwed Up the World” placed liberalism in its epistemological context:

    But the significant influence on Hitler of thinkers such as Darwin and Nietzsche should bring us to the recognition that we can’t hold Hitler up as some kind of singular exemplar of evil. He was a man of his times, a 19th- and 20th-century man who owed as much as Margaret Sanger to the Darwinian eugenic theories in circulation and shared the same reaction as Nietzsche to the Epicurean diminution of man brought about by the liberalism of Hobbes and Mill.

Epilogue

Slavery, abortion, social Darwinism, eugenics and fascism make up the five-headed monster of the Liberal-Muslim Axis. Each head reveals the Nazi doctrine of Lebensunwertes Leben (life unworthy of life). In the modern era, these ideas and policies are directly responsible for the genocide of hundreds of millions of people.

Liberal fascism is exhibited today in policies like Obamacare, TARP, Obama’s takeover of the banking and auto industries, exploiting the Gulf oil leak to destroy the oil industry through federal takeover while forcing Americans into unsustainable alternative energy uses, thus further decimating our economy.

Absent Christianity and Natural Law, Obama’s revolutionary policies will only augment the ever-expanding socialist state under the Liberal-Fascist Axis.

The Liberal-Fascist Axis

May 29, 2010 Culture, Government No comments

Ellis Washington


Shaw idolized Stalin, Hitler and Mussolini as the world’s great “progressive” leaders because they “did things,” unlike the leaders of those “putrefying corpses” called parliamentary democracies.

–Jonah Goldberg, “Liberal Fascism” (2007), p. 134

“The Soviet Story” was a revelatory “documentary on progressivism.” In a revealing excerpt, George Bernard Shaw, the famous playwright and literary critic was filmed in the early 1930s openly defending Hitler, mass murder and genocidal eugenics. The documentary explains liberals’ love affair with fascism, saying: The left supported Hitler not because he deceived them. They knew Hitler would kill. He said he would. In fact, it was why they supported him.

The progressive movement has always been filled with socialist and liberal intellectuals who love to praise depraved tyrants like Mussolini, Lenin, Stalin and Hitler as men of action who, unlike the bureaucrats in our democracies, could get things done. Remember Stalin apologist Walter Duranty, a foreign correspondent for the New York Times who during the ghastly purges in the Ukraine in 1932-33, where over 7 million people were starved, Duranty heartlessly rationalized, “In order to make an omelet you have to break a few eggs.”

The leftists of the Liberal-Fascist Axis have never been shy about their admiration for totalitarian government, using the Machiavellian idea of the end justifying the means as a common pretext for killing millions of people through ideology, eugenics, war, the Holocaust, abortion, social revolution, ghettoization, redistribution of wealth, the Green movement, etc.: All diabolical means are permissible for progressives to achieve their utopian kingdom of power and control on earth.
Read more

Why liberals evangelize

March 20, 2010 Uncategorized No comments

Ellis Washington


Liberalism will always fail because it will always collapse upon the weight of its own immorality.

–Anonymous

I consider myself a conservative intellectual, a thinker who holds philosophical ideas out the Judeo-Christian traditions of intellectual thought. That said, without fail when I write an article about the diabolical influence of Darwin’s theory of evolution on society, I get some of the most reactionary, incoherent rants from the liberal blogosphere.

Exhibit one: Liberal blogger Ed Brayton is a well-known atheist who (along with his fellow bloggers) absolutely hates everything good about America – which I guess would explain why he hates my writings and ideas so much because I am a Christian, a conservative and am very pro-America.

Below is our correspondence over just one of my articles, “When killer whales kill: a biblical view.” It would be instructive to read that article first so as to properly understand the context of Brayton’s love-hate attachment to my ideas.

Dear Mr. Ed Brayton:

Thank you for your response, which didn’t really get to the heart of the matter:

Believing in a “theory” the creator (Darwin) of which knew before and after he wrote “The Origin of Species” was full of holes, unbelievable and unsustainable – for you to follow such a man is like following a cult leader. Your position is ipso facto (inherently) indefensible. You have built an entire worldview on quicksand. Lenin referred to true believers like you and your fellow bloggers as “useful idiots.”

Here is your question:

Can you provide a coherent, consistent explanation other than common descent for the patterns of appearance of endogenous retroviruses in vertebrate genomes? Francis Collins, the Christian geneticist who headed up the Human Genome Project, lays out much of the data on ERVs in his book “The Language of God” and argues, quite correctly, that it simply cannot be explained without common descent (which is, of course, the theory of evolution).

Since I am not a scientist but a philosopher and an intellectual, the way I approach all bodies of knowledge is from reason and veritas (truth). We could argue back and forth on Darwin’s theory all day, but let’s cut to the chase. Mr. Brayton, how can you rationalize and compare your humanist and atheist ideas in relation to St. Paul’s letter to the Church at Rome? Particularly Romans 1:18-23:

For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;

Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.

For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:

Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.

Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,

And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.

Ed, St. Paul had already dealt with Darwin’s specious theories of man (vs. 23) and the philosophers of his day, who were a lot smarter than you and your fellow bloggers. I also addressed the unsustainable aspects of Darwinian evolution in my law review article, Reply to Judge Richard A. Ponser on the Inseparability of Law and Morality.”

Your issues about where humanity came from are not so much a problem of the head (brain), but of the heart (soul). Until you repent and ask Jesus to come into your heart you will always be confused and wrong in your worldview, which will disallow you, I and your fellow bloggers the ability to have a rational discussion based on the syllogism that was a foundation of Western civilization:

If A = B, then A + B = C

… Big Bang explosions, theories by unremarkable naturalists, ERVs and “billions of years …” cannot explain the complexity of an eye, nor expound upon the incomprehensible diversity and richness of creation. That suit you are wearing on your blog as well as the teeth in your mouth did not explode into place. I learned in science that explosions destroy things, not create things.

Ed, take a look at my law review article. Although it was written 11 years ago, the ideas and ideals are timeless and transcendent.

Peace,

Ellis

P.S.: One word about “common descent”; does that comply with the Bible in Genesis 1:24: And God said, Let the earth bring forth The living creature after his kind, and everything that creepeth upon the ear after his kind: and God saw that it was good. Does the Bible’s repeated refrain “after his kind” comport with Darwin’s “common descent” theory? If not, where did he get that idea?

I repeat: Liberalism will always fail because it will always collapse upon the weight of its own immorality. Demonstrative of this fact is Obama’s current pathetic plea to wavering Democrats to vote for his Stalinist health-care bill in order to save his failed presidency.

As expected, Mr. Brayton couldn’t address any of my questions on substantive grounds; he and his fellow bloggers simply amused themselves setting up false arguments, congratulating each other and devolved to cursing at me. What humanists, liberals and progressives like Mr. Brayton will never understand is that all ideas of man come from man and will return to where man came from – the dust of the earth. The redemption of God through Christ is a transcendent mystery that is far above all the vain ideas of mankind and thus is eternal.

Christian apologist C.S. Lewis could have summarized the Darwinian worldview when he said, All that is not eternal is eternally forgotten.

… And that’s why intellectuals evangelize.

Memo to freeloaders: Solicit money near organic foods supermarkets

March 6, 2010 Culture One comment

Earlier today I was leaving a shopping center where one the most popular organic foods supermarkets is located and there was an individual, relatively clean, holding a sign soliciting money. I have seen this individual the last several times I have been to this particular shopping center (note: I, of course, wasn’t shopping at the organic foods store).

This leads me to believe that it must be a lucrative location for such activity, but why? Think about it: Who shops at organic food supermarkets? Answer: Liberals. OK, so some conservatives shop there, which is fine. I’m not knocking the idea of organic food here. The point is that it’s mostly liberals who shop at those types of supermarkets. And what are liberals? Guilt-ridden.

So no wonder this freeloading individual stakes out that particular area. It’s a prime location to rake in a significant amount of money from the guilt-ridden liberals. But remember, most liberals don’t feel guilty out of some desire desire to help the downtrodden. They give money to freeloaders to help themselves feel better. That’s wrong. It’s selfish. But what do the freeloaders care, they’re reaping the benefits of liberals’ acts of selfishness.

So take note, freeloaders: Find the nearest location of an organic foods supermarket and start tapping into the endless selfishness of do-gooder liberals.

Prison karaoke anyone?

March 1, 2010 Government, Policy One comment

If you’re looking for the latest and greatest entertainment the American prison system has to over then head on down to the Miami-Dade county jail. Apparently Miami-Dade resembles less of a jail and more like a local bar on a Saturday night. Inmates there are allowed to participate in prison karaoke, or their version of American Idol.

Yesterday, the prison held its 2nd annual Inmate Idol Contest, pitting convicted felons and inmates awaiting trial against each other in a singing and rapping battle.

Corrections officers served as judges as orange jumpsuit-clad jailbirds sang about religion, domestic violence and love.

Seriously?

For the second year in a row, Andrew Cashmere, 38, took home the top prize. Cashmere, who is awaiting trial on gun-related charges, performed a religious reggae rap that thrilled the small crowd.

“When I see the crowd, my mind goes crazy,” Cashmere told the Miami Herald. “You gotta pull my cord. You gotta put a lock on my mouth. I can’t stop.”

Second place went to Cortez Atkins, 32, for his rap about treating women well. Atkins is awaiting trial on drug, alcohol and domestic-violence charges.

Now that’s irony right there.

The prison holds the contest to not only showcase the inmates’ talents but also to boost their morale.

Way to be good liberals Miami-Dade county jail staff. After all, maintaining or improving inmates’ self-esteem should be the primary goal of our correctional facilities, not abolishing their criminal behavior. Way to nurture the inmates’ talents. It seems to me that the correctional officers are acting more like talent managers and less like officers of the law.

What’s truly infuriating about this story is the percentage of readers on Miami’s NBC affiliate’s site that find it amusing: 40% think “Inmate Idol” is funny; and only 23% find it infuriating. Heck, 13% are thrilled with it.

And you wonder how Barack Obama was elected president?

Darwin is freezing over

February 20, 2010 Government, Policy One comment

Ellis Washington


Unless we announce disasters, no one will listen.

–Sir John Houghton, founder of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPPC)

… I am quite conscious that my speculations run beyond the bounds of true science. … It is a mere rag of an hypothesis with as many flaw[s] and holes as sound parts.

–Charles Darwin, letter to Asa Gray

As this man-caused global warming (now climate change) fraud comes crashing down upon the heads of all the state-controlled scientists, U.N. bureaucrats, Al Gore, political hacks on both sides of the aisle and humanist academics, I am reminded of an aphorism I wrote in an earlier article: “Show me a monopoly and I’ll show you a tyranny.”

I cannot help to see this manmade climate change scam being our modern-day equivalent to Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution 150 years ago, which I consider scientific mythology or fairy tales for adults.

In a fine article published in the U.K. Daily Mail by Jonathan Petre of professor Phil Jones’ BBC interview, the title said it all: “Climategate U-turn as scientist at center of row admits: There has been no global warming since 1995.”

One hundred fifty years ago, Charles Darwin, an unremarkable British naturalist, was able to beguile the entire education, political, scientific and intellectual world with his sophistic and unscientific theories of the origin of man as chronicled in his two famous books: “The Origin of Species” (1859) and “The Descent of Man” (1871). As it was then so it is now; Darwin and his zealous legions of followers had not one shred of verifiable evidence for their theory. Truth and logic are not required to join the cult of Darwin or global warming; complete religious devotion is.

But for some Chinese hackers publishing private e-mails between professor Jones and his colleagues at the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit and Pennsylvania State University, the public may have never known that all of their data on climate change was counterfeit and contrived; but more importantly, that the entire theory of manmade global warming was a willful scientific fraud from its beginning.

In modern times, education, science, politics and money have become inseparable and thus degraded. Tens of trillions of dollars in federal grant money is now in jeopardy, money dishonest U.N. bureaucrats for decades have been extorting from America’s taxpayers and corporations.

Show me a monopoly and I’ll show you a tyranny.

In America we have record-shattering snowstorms and cold fronts from Florida to Alaska. Presently there is snow in 49 of our 50 states. Global-warming patron saint Al Gore is nowhere to be found because he knows he would be laughed to scorn at any venue where he appeared. Even a Senate committee hearing discussing the impacts of global warming was canceled last week due to record-breaking snowstorms in America’s capital.

Ordinary citizens can just look out their windows and see that the premise behind anthropogenic (man-caused) global warming is a complete deception that the United Nations has wasted untold hundreds of billions of dollars funding. If Obama and the Democrats have their way, America will have to pay additional tens of trillions of dollars over the next 15 years just to comply with the Kyoto Protocols by drastically lowering our standard of living to levels of the 1860s!

Show me a monopoly and I’ll show you a tyranny.

By the way, the world’s three most polluting countries – China, India and Brazil – have made it clear to the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change that they have no intention on lowering their carbon-dioxide emissions, because free-market capitalism makes their economies grow stronger while the economies of the U.S. and most European countries are being crippled with socialism.

Jones also conceded the existence of the Medieval Warming Period, which occurred from approximately A.D. 800 to 1300, as well as recent warming cycles from 1910 to 1940 and from 1975 to 1998, which professor Jones was forced to admit had nothing to do with man causation and that the growth of cities has no effect on global warming.

One man, Charles Darwin, 150 years ago through his diabolical theory of evolution has done what the Goths, the Visigoths, the Saxons, the Vandals and Attila the Hun could not do – destroy Western civilization by marginalizing objective truth. Before Darwin, Western civilization was based on logic, symmetry and the Judeo-Christian traditions of intellectual thought.

Darwinism is a radical, evolutionary worldview that systematically denigrated Christianity, the Constitution and the academy and has tried to destroy objective truth. Now most politicians, judges, academics, theologians and intellectuals believe that truth is relative; morality is in the eye of the beholder. Every man does what is right in his own eyes.

Show me a monopoly and I’ll show you a tyranny.

Always follow the money. Al Gore has made approximately $500 million dollars and won the Nobel Peace Prize propagating the Big Lie of global warming internationally. It is critical with these people that mankind (i.e., America) be the blame. Why?

Look at it through the eyes of shyster lawyers. To fund their frivolous tort lawsuits unscrupulous lawyers look to find “deep pockets” (i.e., large corporations, doctors, inventors) for their clients to sue. Radical environmentalists are following the same strategies. America has the ultimate deep pockets to fund United Nation boondoggles for years until we bankrupt ourselves.

Understand, dear reader, that liberalism has three characteristics: 1) Liberalism it is a pagan religion rooted in perverse ideology, fanaticism and humanism – the idea that man is the center of all things; 2) Liberals love humanity, but hate people. Liberalism views people as separate and antagonistic to nature, thus population-control advocates want to drastically reduce the world’s population through various socialist, statist policies; and 3) As President Ronald Reagan said, liberalism will always fail because it will collapse upon the weight of its own immorality.

… And Darwinism is freezing over.

The Liberal-Muslim axis, part 2

January 9, 2010 Culture, Government, World No comments

Ellis Washington

My recent article, “The Liberal-Muslim Axis,” provoked such sycophantic ranting from the Alinsky left that I thought it prudent to write a follow-up article on the same subject.

Ayers in Egypt

Florida radio host Pam Geller wrote of President Obama’s Chicago mentors who launched his political career in Chicago, Bill Ayers and his wife, Bernardine Dohrn, who recently took their Jew-hating rampage to the Middle East.

The protests were led by Jodie Evans, co-founder of Code Pink, a far-left activist organization formed in 2002 to protest America’s war in Iraq. Code Pink recently met with terrorist groups, Hamas and with leaders of the Taliban. Evans was also a fundraiser and financial
bundler for Obama’s presidential campaign.

Ayers and Dohrn, 1960s radicals both, have the ear of the evangelical left. A number of mainline liberal churches have proposed boycotts and divestment from any company that does business with Israel, including the United Church of Christ, the denomination of the Rev. Jeremiah Wright and President Obama.

The protesters in Gaza are merely Islamic propagandists spewing taiqiya (lies to advance Islam). Thus, the Obama-Ayers-Wright Axis is congruent to the Liberal-Muslim Axis.

‘Palestinian Christians’ against the Jews

Old South Church in Boston (United Church of Christ) has hosted conferences of an anti-Zionist organization that calls itself “Friends of Sabeel, Christians.” In a landmark decision on Sept. 17, 2009, Britain’s trade unions voted unanimously to participate in a mass boycott movement, disinvestment and sanctions not against Iran, Syria or Saudi Arabia, but against little Israel – demanding a negotiated settlement based on “justice” for Palestinians.

The motion was passed at the 2009 Trades Union Annual Congress in Liverpool by unions representing 6.5 million workers across the U.K. Britain’s trade unions, together with those of South Africa and Ireland, voted to use a mass boycott campaign as a tool to bring Israel into line with international law and pressure it to comply with U.N. resolutions that seek to support an independent Palestinian state by damaging the state that feeds and protects them, Israel.

Here you have liberal Christian denominations in America and throughout Europe allied with Palestinian Christians boycotting against the tiny nation of Israel – a fragile, embattled country that is one war away from Hitler’s Holocaust, part 2. These global, anti-Semitic boycotts against the Jews are indeed a major part of the vast Liberal-Muslim Axis.
Read more

Republicans plotted the Christmas Day airliner bombing

January 8, 2010 Media No comments

Well, at least according to some kook, liberal talk show host named Mike Malloy (never heard of him). Get a load of this:

Can we get this guy a straightjacket, please?

« Older Entries